Wednesday 25 August 2021

Narinder Singh Azad Vs. Bank of Baroda - Therefore, the application being completed under the provisions of Section 94 of IBC, 2016 and reasons recorded in the report of the Resolution Professional is hereby admitted under section 100 of the IBC.

NCLT New Delhi-III (15.02.2021) in  Narinder Singh Azad  Vs. Bank of Baroda   [IA - 4332 (ND)/2020 & IA-4207/2020 ] held that; 

  • It is also stated that the Corporate Debtor viz., V Anlez Technologies Private Limited was dissolved vide Order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the Hon'ble High Court.

  • However, from the report there does not appear any request of the Resolution Professional for issuance of the instructions for the purpose of conducting negotiations between the debtor and creditors for arriving at the repayment plan. Therefore, the application being completed under the provisions of Section 94 of IBC, 2016 and reasons recorded in the report of the Resolution Professional is hereby admitted under section 100 of the IBC, 2016 by initiating the Insolvency Resolution Process in CP IB -859/PB/2019 against the Applicant/Debtor and the moratorium is declared as provided under Sec 101 of IBC


Excerpts of the order; 

# 1. The Resolution Professional has filed two application out of which the application IA - 4207/2020 is the Written consent to act as Resolution Professional (Form A) filed by the Resolution Professional viz., Mr. Ravinder Singh Kathuria (hereinafter referred as "Resolution Professional") who was appointed vide Order dated 28.9.2020. The Resolution Professional has declared that there are no disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Board or the Insolvency Professional Agency, he does not suffer from any disability and is eligible to be appointed as Resolution Professional of the Guarantor. Therefore, as prayed the application is taken on record. 


# 2. It is recalled that on presentation of the application by the Personal Guarantor/Debtor the Resolution Professional was appointed to file report under Section 99 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred as "IBC, 2016") which has been filed bearing number IA - 4332 (ND)/2020. The Resolution Professional has stated that at this juncture he is not in a position to recommend for treating the Application under Fresh Start under Chapter II. The Resolution Professional has prayed for admission of the application filed under section 94 of IBC, 2016 in order to make through Investigation. 


# 3. The report provides that the Financial Creditor viz., Bank of Baroda (earlier · Vijaya Bank) had instituted a recovery suit before Debt Recovery Tribunal, New Delhi in the year 2014 and the Judgement was passed in the year 2016 however, the executing proceedings are pending in the Debt Recovery Tribunal against the Personal Guarantor/Debtor. It is also stated that the Corporate Debtor viz., V Anlez Technologies Private Limited was dissolved vide Order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the Hon'ble High Court. Further, it is stated that the total debt including interest and penalties w.e.f. 03.01.2014 of Bank of Baroda (earlier Vijaya Bank) was Rs. 5,51,83,692 alongwith cost of Rs. 1,50,000/- on the suit amount till the realisation and as per the recovery certificate issued by the DRT, New Delhi. It is stated that the loan was secured with 3 (three) properties of the Personal Guarantor/Debtor and the loan amount was classified as NPA in the year 2012. 


# 4. The Report further states that in reply the Personal Guarantor/Debtor has submitted that the total outstanding is to the tune of Rs. 3.52 Crores after realisation of the sale proceeds of the assets kept as Security. 


# 5. However, from the report there does not appear any request of the Resolution Professional for issuance of the instructions for the purpose of conducting negotiations between the debtor and creditors for arriving at the repayment plan. Therefore, the application being completed under the provisions of Section 94 of IBC, 2016 and reasons recorded in the report of the Resolution Professional is hereby admitted under section 100 of the IBC, 2016 by initiating the Insolvency Resolution Process in CP IB -859/PB/2019 against the Applicant/Debtor and the moratorium is declared as provided under Sec 101 of IBC, 2016. During the moratorium period; 

  • a) Any pending legal action or proceeding in respect of any debt shall be deemed to have been stayed; and 

  • b) The creditors of the debtor shall not initiate any legal action or proceedings in respect of any debt; and 

  • c) The debtor shall not transfer, alienate, encumber, or dispose off any of his assets or his legal rights or beneficial interest therein; 

  • d) The provisions of this section shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator. 


# 6. The Resolution Professional viz., Mr. Ravinder Singh Kathuria, who has been appointed under Section 97 vide Order dated 28.09.2020, is directed to cause a public notice on behalf of the Adjudicating Authority within 7 days of uploading of this Order on the website of the NCLT Delhi, inviting claims from all Creditors, who shall register their claims as provided under Section 103 within 21 days of such issuance. The notice shall contain the necessary information as provided under Section 102 (2) of IBC, 2016. The publication of notice shall be made in newspapers, one in English and other in Vernacular which has wide circulation in the State where the Debtor resides. The copy of the notice shall be affixed in the premises of this Authority and the Registry shall place a copy of the same on the website of this. Authority. 


# 7. The Resolution Professional in exercise of the powers conferred under section 104 shall prepare a list of creditors within 30 days from the date of the notice. The debtor shall prepare a repayment plan in consultation with the Resolution Professional as provided under Section 105, which shall include the provisions for payment of fee to the Professional. The Resolution Professional shall submit the repayment plan with his report within a period of 21 days from the last date of submission of claims as provided under Section 106. The Resolution Professional will convene a meeting of the Creditors, If he is of the opinion that the meeting of the creditors should be summoned. The date of meeting should not be less than 14 days or more than 28 days from the date of submission of the Report under Sub section (1) of Section 106, for which at least 14 days' notice to the creditors (as per the list prepared] shall be issued by all modes fulfilling the requirements as per the provisions of section 107. 


# 8. The meeting of the creditors shall be conducted in accordance with Sections 108, 109, 110 & 111. The Resolution Professional shall prepare a report for repayment of plan as provided under Section 112 and submit the same to this Authority by providing a copy to the debtor and the Creditors. It is made clear that the Resolution Professional shall perform his function and duties in compliance with the code as provided under section 208 of the IBC, 2016. 


# 9. In terms of the above, the Insolvency Resolution Process stands initiated against the Debtor/Personal Guarantor. 


--------------------------------------------

Blogger’s comments; In the present case the corporate debtor was dissolved much before the application was filed by the personal guarantor under section 94. As such in the present case the Adjudicating Authority as per section 79 is DRT. 


# Section 60. Adjudicating Authority for corporate persons. -

(1) The Adjudicating Authority, in relation to insolvency resolution and liquidation for corporate persons including corporate debtors and personal guarantors thereof shall be the National Company Law Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the registered office of a corporate person is located.

(2) Without prejudice to sub-section (1) and notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Code, where a corporate insolvency resolution process or liquidation proceeding of a corporate debtor is pending before a National Company Law Tribunal, an application relating to the insolvency resolution or liquidation or bankruptcy of a corporate guarantor or personal guarantor, as the case may be, of such corporate debtor shall be filed before the National Company Law Tribunal.

(3) An insolvency resolution process or liquidation or bankruptcy proceeding of a corporate guarantor or personal guarantor, as the case may be, of the corporate debtor pending in any court or tribunal shall stand transferred to the Adjudicating Authority dealing with insolvency resolution process or liquidation proceeding of such corporate debtor.


Insolvency Resolution and Bankruptcy for Individuals and Partnership Firms 


# Section 78. Application. -

This Part shall apply to matters relating to fresh start, insolvency and bankruptcy of individuals and partnership firms where the amount of the default is not less than one thousand rupees:

Provided that the Central Government may, by notification, specify the minimum amount of default of higher value which shall not be more than one lakh rupees.


# Section 79. Definitions. -

In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, -

(1) “Adjudicating Authority” means the Debt Recovery Tribunal constituted under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993 (51 of 1993);


----------------------------------------------


No comments:

Post a Comment

State Bank of India Vs Mukesh Hariram Bansal. - Section 98 of the IBC provides for replacement of the Resolution Professional on sufficient ground.

  NCLAT (2024.05.01) in State Bank of India Vs Mukesh Hariram Bansal. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 847 of 2024] held that;. Section...